The Australian Plant Name Index (APNI) is a tool for the botanical community that deals with plant names and their usage in the scientific literature, whether as a current name or synonym. APNI does not recommend any particular taxonomy or nomenclature. For a listing of currently accepted scientific names for the Australian vascular flora, please use the Australian Plant Census (APC) link above.
Showing Banksia prionophylla
- APC
- Plantae(reg.)
- Charophyta(div.)
- Equisetopsida(cl.)
- Magnoliidae(subcl.)
- Proteanae(superordo)
- Proteales(ordo)
- Proteaceae(fam.)
- Banksia(gen.)
- prionophylla(sp.)
-
APC Comment: Banksia prionophylla F.Muell. is here considered to be nom. nud., nom. inval., and the type material is considered by A.S.George (Nuytsia 3: 396, 1991; Fl. Australia 17B: 231, 1999) to represent B. spinulosa var. cunninghamii (Sieber ex Rchb.) A.S.George. The name was published by Mueller (First Gen. Rep. Veg. Colony 17, 1853) without a description. Some authors (e.g. A.D.Chapman, Austral. Pl. Index 366, 1991; A.S.George, Fl. Australia 17B: 231, 1999) have considered the name to have been validated by Meisner (Linnaea 26: 353, 1853). However, Meisner provides no indication that he accepts Mueller’s new taxon, commenting “absque flore haude certe dignoscenda” [without flowers by no means identifiable] and that the sterile material possibly represents B. littoralis R.Br. See also K.R.Thiele & P.G.Wilson, Austral. Syst. Botany Newsl., 135: 4 (2008). -
APC Dist.: WA
-
APC Comment: Banksia prionophylla F.Muell. is here considered to be nom. nud., nom. inval., and the type material is considered by A.S.George (Nuytsia 3: 396, 1991; Fl. Australia 17B: 231, 1999) to represent B. spinulosa var. cunninghamii (Sieber ex Rchb.) A.S.George. The name was published by Mueller (First Gen. Rep. Veg. Colony 17, 1853) without a description. Some authors (e.g. A.D.Chapman, Austral. Pl. Index 366, 1991; A.S.George, Fl. Australia 17B: 231, 1999) have considered the name to have been validated by Meisner (Linnaea 26: 353, 1853). However, Meisner provides no indication that he accepts Mueller’s new taxon, commenting “absque flore haude certe dignoscenda” [without flowers by no means identifiable] and that the sterile material possibly represents B. littoralis R.Br. See also K.R.Thiele & P.G.Wilson, Austral. Syst. Botany Newsl., 135: 4 (2008). -
APC Dist.: WA